Put a dollar band on what AI can unlock across your organization.
A fixed-scope sprint that maps your highest-potential workflows, names the binding constraints, and ships a three-layer return estimate your leadership team can act on, at the team, department, or company level.
Every company has documentation. Almost none have legibility.
A workflow is legible when humans or agents can act on it without asking what's involved. Role boundaries are explicit. Handoffs are named. Exceptions are written down. Data is queryable on demand. Decision rights are clear.
Most companies have the first kind. Almost none have the second. That's why the return never lands: hard savings stay locked inside roles and software that manual workflows require, revenue stays on the table while your best people do work agents could handle, and cross-functional potential never compounds. The audit measures all three.
Find what's blocking the return. Put a number on it.
The work is concrete. We select the workflows with the most optimization potential, decompose roles into mandates, trace data flows and the blockers between them, and instrument the baselines needed to measure what moves. The output is a depth of legibility that didn't exist before, and a dollar band attached to it.
It fits anyone whose pilots have run faster than the organization underneath them, from the pre-IPO operator with a hundred catalogued use cases that refuse to compound, to the 25-person foundation that already knows the redesign is overdue. You choose the scope: a single team, a department, or the whole company.
Select & scope
Select the highest-potential workflows. Scope the four surfaces with leadership: roles, mandates, workflows, data.
Mapping
Decompose roles into mandates. Trace data flows and handoffs. Surface the rules people carry in their heads.
Scoring
Score departments across the six vectors. Name the binding constraint holding the return below potential.
Baselines
Instrument what moves the needle: the hours, costs, and KPI dollar-chains the return is built from.
Return modeling
Build the three-layer estimate: hard savings, revenue-adjacent KPIs, cross-functional compounding. Each as a band, not a point.
Roadmap & readout
Sequence the opportunities. Write the 90-day plan. Walk leadership through the number and the offer.
A defensible number, and the map your leadership team acts from.
Working artifacts. Yours regardless of what comes next.
-
01
Three-layer return estimate.
A dollar band on what AI can unlock in scope: the hard savings available this quarter, the revenue-adjacent KPIs we can move as people shift to higher-value work, and the cross-functional potential that compounds as the transformation deepens. Conservative to aggressive, with the reasoning attached. Defensible to a board.
-
02
Atlas foundations.
A populated, machine-readable operating map of in-scope departments: roles, mandates, workflows, systems, dependencies, blockers. A static reference after the audit, designed to evolve into a real-time dashboard for the rollout. The baseline is yours regardless of what comes next.
-
03
Six-vector heatmap.
Per-department scoring with rationale and evidence. Usable to brief a board, a buyer, or a new hire on day one.
-
04
Binding-constraint diagnosis.
Which vector, in which department, is gating the return. Most readiness reports list weaknesses. This names the one that has to move first.
-
05
90-day path and offer.
What's ready to move now, what's blocked by data or governance, what depends on deeper redesign, sequenced for funding decisions. Paired with an offer structure for the build that puts us at risk against the result.
An answer to what should come next, backed by a number you can defend.
Three-layer return estimate. Live Atlas foundation. Scored heatmap. Binding-constraint diagnosis. Ninety-day plan. Yours regardless of what happens next.